The vaccines and their consequences
After carefully considering the data available to me, the following six aspects of the vaccine stand out as the most important things to know before making a decision on whether to get vaccinated or not. These are, in the best case scenario, ignored by the media, but more often they are lied about by the media.
In the first 14 to 21 days of receiving the vaccines, people are significantly more likely to get the virus than the unvaccinated. The mechanism behind this is unclear, but it may be due to a general weakening of the immune system. I do not consider this to be controversial, yet it has been ignored in the media and the literature. Ostensibly because stating this simple fact would create vaccine hesitancy. Instead, this period of time has been considered the period before you “get protection”. I consider any doctor that has made this statement to be willingly committing malpractice. It is a dangerous statement and may be what has driven the so-called 4th wave. Basically, vaccination campaigns have lead to mass numbers of people with weakened immune systems getting and, by proxy of the cohort system of these campaigns, spreading the virus at a much faster rate than they would have otherwise. These people are not taking extra precautions and often ignoring symptoms of the virus believing them to be adverse events. The virus gains a foothold in the population and spreads at an accelerated rate. In other words, those receiving any dose of the vaccine should be locked down for several weeks in order to prevent this accelerated spread even if the vaccine has medium term benefits. Interestingly, because these people are not considered “protected”, the unvaccinated are blamed even though a significant proportion of the population would have already gained natural immunity in the last two years; thus, the waves would not have been as large this year if not for vaccination campaigns.
Natural immunity is proven to be more effective than the vaccines in every single scenario. This is also not an uncontroversial fact, but the hysteria around this virus has lead to this being thrown out the window. The reasoning behind the gaslighting of natural immunity is less clear than in point 1. It would not be problematic to create vaccine hesitancy in those with natural immunity because they should not be getting the vaccine in the first place. There are three reasons I can think of for this happening. There could be little faith in the tests, so policymakers are uncertain who actually has natural immunity. If this were true, it would undermine the last two years of lockdowns as they have been based on the tests. Or it could be that this is a focused campaign, probably driven by drug money, to ensure that those with natural immunity are in the vaccinated cohort in order to drive up the vaccine effectiveness numbers. This is the most likely scenario in my eyes and vaccine effectiveness numbers are indeed being driven up this way. One survey estimated that those with natural immunity are twice as likely to get the vaccine and this number has likely increased with healthcare workers and others who likely were infected with the virus over the last two years being forced to get vaccinated (plus the earlier effect of accelerated spread in the first 14 days). Some estimates have been as high as 40% of Americans getting the virus in the last year. If twice as many of those with natural immunity got vaccinated, this has an enormous impact on vaccine effectiveness calculations to the point where they are entirely unreliable and even fraudulent. The final possible explanation is that policymakers are simply stupid, which is also, of course, a plausible theory.
Vaccine effectiveness is a terrible calculation. It is comparing two separate populations with distinct characteristics and very little, if any, control mechanisms in place. Frankly, we needed long-term randomized control trials (and preferably ones not run by drug dealers) to understand what is going on. As those control trials were unblinded and most of the control group received the vaccine, we have absolutely no way of knowing how effective the vaccines are in the short or long run. We also have no idea what the adverse reactions are and subsequently if there is any benefit in all cause mortality from the vaccines.
Adverse events are real, disturbing, and not anywhere near as rare as proclaimed in the media. It is funny after two years of the media claiming the virus is deadly, I have not seen a single article noting that complications from the virus are rare, even exceedingly rare in most age groups. The average age of coronavirus deaths are well above average life expectancy. Most age groups have little to no risk especially if no weight problems or comorbidities exist. Estimates of myocarditis from the vaccine out of several countries are as high as 1 in 4000 for certain groups, way above what could ever be expected from the virus. Blood clots are certainly underestimated with only a few of the most undeniable cases ever coming to light. One television doctor estimated that serious blood clots were occuring in as many as 1 in 10,000 cases, but he has subsequently stopped discussing the issue. Others have raised alarm bells on wide spread blood clotting, which pose minor or no symptoms in the vaccinated group, yet may lead to serious long term consequences. I do not have access to data that might inform me, but the presence of major clotting events may be the canary in the coal mine. Neurological problems and other severe issues do not even get reported on. Contrary to popular belief, these adverse events occur in all major vaccine lines regardless of which drug dealers produce them. Considering people have likened fighting the virus to fighting a war, I consider the obfuscation of adverse events from the vaccines to be war crimes at best.
The vaccines appear to have medium term benefits in reducing the effect of the virus in certain populations. Again, this is likely overestimated due to the aforementioned problems with vaccine effectiveness and the difference between population groups. Unfortunately, most public health officials are treating health as if this virus is the only thing that exists. The benefit of reducing the effect of the virus in the medium term is not nearly as important as it has been made out to be when you consider all of the above factors. Yet, it suggests that certain individuals may want to get vaccinated. Those that do feel the medium term benefits are useful to themselves should be careful to self-isolate after getting vaccinated, and should have a full accounting of the risks involved. Unforunately, considering the risks of an adverse event lack good data, the presence of alternative treatment methods for the virus, and the fact that it is still unclear what the real level of vaccine effectiveness is in the medium term, it would be hard for me to imagine what group of people this would be.
The vaccine appears to be less effective in the long term. I believe much of this is due to the problems in calculating vaccine effectiveness, but the data is poor on this front because we lack a full accounting of natural immunity in the population. Nonetheless, it is important to know why the vaccine is failing over time before giving people booster shots. Some “experts” have suggested they are looking at antibody levels to recommend boosters and not just vaccine effectiveness over time. I will not weigh into that debate except to note that the same experts also claim that antibodies deteriorate at a faster rate in those that are at a higher risk to the virus in the first place, which means those at end of life will be subject to more boosters and more opportunities to have an adverse event from the vaccine. There are many credible reasons why these vaccines likely have long-term adverse events and, while nothing can be done for those that have taken the vaccine to date, the goal should be minimizing their exposure to subsequent events. In any case, the adverse events we know about are common, and every dose increases the opportunities for them to occur to people.
If I missed any important aspects of the vaccine, left important considerations out, or you believe I am completely wrong, I would love to hear feedback. There are many other reasons to be unwilling to take this vaccine, and many reasons to believe that the data I have available to me make the vaccine look significantly better than it is, but I have tried to avoid broad spectrum speculation in this post.