I think you pretty well covered it. I honestly believe that the easing of restrictions will only last into the fall. It's a bone they have thrown to the masses. If we sit back now and be complacent then it will be easy for governments to ramp it all back up in the fall. And most likely by then there will be another varient with yet another vaccine. While we all welcome the " temporary suspension" of vaccine passports, there is no guarantee they will not be ressurected at a later date. A perfect illustration of the disconnect with our politicians was a comment by Premier John Horgan of British Columbia. When asked in a press conference what he thought about the truckers convoy arriving in Victoria in a matter of a few days he was not only angry and derisive of this up coming protest but suggested these people should get a hobby or another cause to complain about since, after all, British Columbia was giving our privileges back. What he and all politicians seem to fail to realize is we want all mandates permanently removed and never used again. That's why the protests are not stopping. We mustn't be lead into a false state of security.
Thank you for your succinct summation of the two years of hell that the corporate entities of gov't, business, medical, educational, msm, religion, legal, and so called entertainment foisted upon the world's inhabitants in order to push forward their one world corporation concentration camp. People not convinced by the lies need to continue working toward intelligently and ethically pulling back Oz's curtain for the blinded ones to see which will hopefully lead them to find that internal place to stand up and shake off the chains they've been fooled into accepting. I thank you for your diligence in being a curtain opener.
As you pointed out in #4, there is a positive to come out of all this. Both the medical community (pushing pills as opposed to healing people) and the mainstream media have been bought out long before CoViD. The handling of the pandemic has woken people up to how deeply corrupt every level of government is, and how that has filtered down through all other institutions, with censorship, bribes, threats. These things can’t be unseen.
You missed an Order In Council gun ban which the association of chiefs of police in Canada said would do nothing. After a false flag, a few months in to covid, when parliament was suspended, and it was unlawful to go outside and protest. I'm sure that's just a coincidence and has nothing to do with UN's sustainability goals.
May 1st, they start kicking in doors and confiscating guns (rifles) that have made no contribution to gun deaths in Canada. Once they get that done, confiscating all pistols (which all of the shootings come from - in Toronto) will be a slam dunk.
Civilian disarmament achieved. Another barrier to totalitarianism removed with no parliamentary debate.
Superb! Thank you. Comprehensive, and utterly damning. And, there was, of course, much that you did not include only because the flood of dysfunction and evil was so continuous and enormous that to catalogue it all would be a near-endless task.
There will no doubt be further reveals to the wider resulting rings of this cinder block (pandem/interventions) thrown into the pond of humanity as the reasoning surrounding it is given further context.
Exhibit A - December 12, 2017
Wilson Centre discussion on issue of artificial intelligence, A.I. citizens, bio-watermarking (how would that be done exactly, any guesses?)
Eugenics. Here in Sweden handicapped people, especially those with cognitive handicaps, and people having certain diagnoses were denied basic service, vaccinations, and health care. "Back of the line", and the line kept growing sort of.
Because criminals, ISIL-soldiers returning to Sweden (Gothenburg alone provided more soldiers for ISIL than all of Germany), pedophiles and such all got treatment before the most vulnerable got it.
Because eugenics is as endemic to liberals and lefties as is their hatred of jews.
Reading like the Devil reads the Bible I see. Read what I actually wrote.
"...were denied basic service, vaccinations, and health care."
"...and such all got treatment before the most vulnerable got it."
Treatment. As in health care, as in surgery, aid, medications, physio, rehab, dental and so on.
Also, remember that initially there were no data showing the dangers involved with the mRNA-jabs. The decision to prioritise the scum of the Earth before those with disabilities was made on the assumption that the jabs worked as advertised and that they were necessary, meaning that the bastards I initially listed was valued higher by the socialist democratic governement.
If they have been acting in "good faith" in "vaccines", maybe. But we know for sure that "good faith" or "public health" were never their motivators, don't we? And "treatments" were denied, unless they would kill (like remdesivir, intubations), denial of treatment with repurposed drugs, or ANY early treatment, for that matter. So I still don't understand what you bemoan. If anything, the vulnerable have been spared, IMHO, by this "neglect". Lucky they.
But maybe in Sweden it was much different, then I take my words back.
Why can't you admit to overreacting due to misunderstanding? Your whole argument is ex post facto.
If the shots had worked as advertised, the handicapped still would have been forced to wait until after criminals had gotten theirs. As in, criminals without handicaps counts for more according to socialist democrats.
The trial and approval process for Sweden adopting the Pfizer jab looked like this:
Our FDA/CDC looks at what their US colleagues say, and what the EMA (EU eq.) say. If it looks good, it's approved for use. No sepatate testing done. It's been that way since the fifties, which is why we were hit hard by the geman drug Thalidomide/Neurosedyn.
Again, eugenics is missing from the list. Sweden had a eugenic programme from 1922 until 1976; it served as a source of inspiration for nazi-Germany and the same party that initiated it is the party that's in power today. The old eugenic principles still guide much of healthcare and social services - "it's stuck in the walls" as we say, even though it's officially off the books.
You are being wilfully obtuse if you don't get what I'm saying, so let's try again: believing the vaccines worked as the US agencies and profiteers claimed, the handicapped were made to wait until last, simply due to being valued less than criminals by the state.
Do you get the point now? The issue isn't whether the jabs worked based on what is known today, but what decisions were made based on what was believed to be true then.
I think you pretty well covered it. I honestly believe that the easing of restrictions will only last into the fall. It's a bone they have thrown to the masses. If we sit back now and be complacent then it will be easy for governments to ramp it all back up in the fall. And most likely by then there will be another varient with yet another vaccine. While we all welcome the " temporary suspension" of vaccine passports, there is no guarantee they will not be ressurected at a later date. A perfect illustration of the disconnect with our politicians was a comment by Premier John Horgan of British Columbia. When asked in a press conference what he thought about the truckers convoy arriving in Victoria in a matter of a few days he was not only angry and derisive of this up coming protest but suggested these people should get a hobby or another cause to complain about since, after all, British Columbia was giving our privileges back. What he and all politicians seem to fail to realize is we want all mandates permanently removed and never used again. That's why the protests are not stopping. We mustn't be lead into a false state of security.
Thank you for your succinct summation of the two years of hell that the corporate entities of gov't, business, medical, educational, msm, religion, legal, and so called entertainment foisted upon the world's inhabitants in order to push forward their one world corporation concentration camp. People not convinced by the lies need to continue working toward intelligently and ethically pulling back Oz's curtain for the blinded ones to see which will hopefully lead them to find that internal place to stand up and shake off the chains they've been fooled into accepting. I thank you for your diligence in being a curtain opener.
As you pointed out in #4, there is a positive to come out of all this. Both the medical community (pushing pills as opposed to healing people) and the mainstream media have been bought out long before CoViD. The handling of the pandemic has woken people up to how deeply corrupt every level of government is, and how that has filtered down through all other institutions, with censorship, bribes, threats. These things can’t be unseen.
- The global pandemic pact pushed through by WHO to supersede national laws.
- The changes to definition of human rights in the UK to "legally" discriminate those that don't play along in the near future.
I'm certain there is much more to add...
You missed an Order In Council gun ban which the association of chiefs of police in Canada said would do nothing. After a false flag, a few months in to covid, when parliament was suspended, and it was unlawful to go outside and protest. I'm sure that's just a coincidence and has nothing to do with UN's sustainability goals.
May 1st, they start kicking in doors and confiscating guns (rifles) that have made no contribution to gun deaths in Canada. Once they get that done, confiscating all pistols (which all of the shootings come from - in Toronto) will be a slam dunk.
Civilian disarmament achieved. Another barrier to totalitarianism removed with no parliamentary debate.
Superb! Thank you. Comprehensive, and utterly damning. And, there was, of course, much that you did not include only because the flood of dysfunction and evil was so continuous and enormous that to catalogue it all would be a near-endless task.
There will no doubt be further reveals to the wider resulting rings of this cinder block (pandem/interventions) thrown into the pond of humanity as the reasoning surrounding it is given further context.
Exhibit A - December 12, 2017
Wilson Centre discussion on issue of artificial intelligence, A.I. citizens, bio-watermarking (how would that be done exactly, any guesses?)
https://youtu.be/RZbaJelgtCI
Exhibit B - July 31, 2019
Same individual above appears before the United Nations to speak on same subject (starting at about the 12:00 min mark)
https://media.un.org/en/asset/k1h/k1hsbg84vw
"A form of tech convergence, simply too powerful for humankind to refuse*"
- Eleanore Pauwels (speaking before U.N. on synthesis of biotechnology and artificial intelligence)
*When statements are framed, with the conclusion put in such GODFATHERian tones. I am inclined to err on the side of caution. EXTREME CAUTION...
Eugenics. Here in Sweden handicapped people, especially those with cognitive handicaps, and people having certain diagnoses were denied basic service, vaccinations, and health care. "Back of the line", and the line kept growing sort of.
Because criminals, ISIL-soldiers returning to Sweden (Gothenburg alone provided more soldiers for ISIL than all of Germany), pedophiles and such all got treatment before the most vulnerable got it.
Because eugenics is as endemic to liberals and lefties as is their hatred of jews.
So you bemoan the lack of death jabs to the vulnerable? What planet are you from again?
Reading like the Devil reads the Bible I see. Read what I actually wrote.
"...were denied basic service, vaccinations, and health care."
"...and such all got treatment before the most vulnerable got it."
Treatment. As in health care, as in surgery, aid, medications, physio, rehab, dental and so on.
Also, remember that initially there were no data showing the dangers involved with the mRNA-jabs. The decision to prioritise the scum of the Earth before those with disabilities was made on the assumption that the jabs worked as advertised and that they were necessary, meaning that the bastards I initially listed was valued higher by the socialist democratic governement.
Do you understand now?
If they have been acting in "good faith" in "vaccines", maybe. But we know for sure that "good faith" or "public health" were never their motivators, don't we? And "treatments" were denied, unless they would kill (like remdesivir, intubations), denial of treatment with repurposed drugs, or ANY early treatment, for that matter. So I still don't understand what you bemoan. If anything, the vulnerable have been spared, IMHO, by this "neglect". Lucky they.
But maybe in Sweden it was much different, then I take my words back.
Why can't you admit to overreacting due to misunderstanding? Your whole argument is ex post facto.
If the shots had worked as advertised, the handicapped still would have been forced to wait until after criminals had gotten theirs. As in, criminals without handicaps counts for more according to socialist democrats.
The trial and approval process for Sweden adopting the Pfizer jab looked like this:
Our FDA/CDC looks at what their US colleagues say, and what the EMA (EU eq.) say. If it looks good, it's approved for use. No sepatate testing done. It's been that way since the fifties, which is why we were hit hard by the geman drug Thalidomide/Neurosedyn.
Again, eugenics is missing from the list. Sweden had a eugenic programme from 1922 until 1976; it served as a source of inspiration for nazi-Germany and the same party that initiated it is the party that's in power today. The old eugenic principles still guide much of healthcare and social services - "it's stuck in the walls" as we say, even though it's officially off the books.
You are being wilfully obtuse if you don't get what I'm saying, so let's try again: believing the vaccines worked as the US agencies and profiteers claimed, the handicapped were made to wait until last, simply due to being valued less than criminals by the state.
Do you get the point now? The issue isn't whether the jabs worked based on what is known today, but what decisions were made based on what was believed to be true then.