Imagine a hypothetical scenario, say, with a fictional country “X”. Let’s imagine this country has a population of 1 million people, 10 thousand of which have a comorbidity (the edge cases) that makes them particularly susceptible to the virus circulating in the population.
You’re absolutely right, everything is impossibly muddied. The stats they generate give the vaccines a degree of credibility they do not deserve.
An interesting change in Ontario data over the last few weeks:
-Ontario now reports cases and deaths using the following categories. Not fully vaccinated, fully vaccinated, and vaccinated with booster.
-their definition of not fully vaccinated is as follows:
—people did not have any vaccine dose
—symptoms started after receiving the first dose of a 2-dose COVID-19 vaccine
—symptoms started between 0 and less than 14 days after receiving the first dose of a single-dose vaccine series (for example, Janssen)
—symptoms started between 0 and less than 14 days after receiving the second dose of a 2-dose vaccine series.
So they’re now blending a huge number of people who had a single shot of Pfizer or Moderna and stopped due to side effects, along with the 14 day periods after first and second shot, and lumping them all in with unvaccinated.
Interestingly the boosted case rate is nearly twice the “not fully vaccinated” rate. I can’t image merging the above groups in with the unvaccinated improves their performance, I assume it makes it worse.
The death rate is inflated solely by the 60+ “not fully vaccinated” group. It’s likely the 80+ causing most of it however they do not allow you to view in 10 year brackets.
The fact that they keep resorting the data suggests they have an accurate set without the 14 day offsets.
There are a lot of elderly in nursing homes that are simply too sick and frail to be vaccinated even if they wanted it. If they get Covid they will quite likely die and will count as an unvaccinated death. Given that the average age of those dying from Covid is over 80 it strikes me that a lot of the unvaccinated death count could be from this cohort. How on earth we’d find out if this was true I don’t know. Statistics regarding cases and deaths have almost become meaningless
🤯 And it gets worse: "Scientists are currently attempting to develop "contagious vaccines" that would spread from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated, according to a new report." That's one way to ensure 100% vaccination...
You’re absolutely right, everything is impossibly muddied. The stats they generate give the vaccines a degree of credibility they do not deserve.
An interesting change in Ontario data over the last few weeks:
-Ontario now reports cases and deaths using the following categories. Not fully vaccinated, fully vaccinated, and vaccinated with booster.
-their definition of not fully vaccinated is as follows:
—people did not have any vaccine dose
—symptoms started after receiving the first dose of a 2-dose COVID-19 vaccine
—symptoms started between 0 and less than 14 days after receiving the first dose of a single-dose vaccine series (for example, Janssen)
—symptoms started between 0 and less than 14 days after receiving the second dose of a 2-dose vaccine series.
So they’re now blending a huge number of people who had a single shot of Pfizer or Moderna and stopped due to side effects, along with the 14 day periods after first and second shot, and lumping them all in with unvaccinated.
Interestingly the boosted case rate is nearly twice the “not fully vaccinated” rate. I can’t image merging the above groups in with the unvaccinated improves their performance, I assume it makes it worse.
The death rate is inflated solely by the 60+ “not fully vaccinated” group. It’s likely the 80+ causing most of it however they do not allow you to view in 10 year brackets.
The fact that they keep resorting the data suggests they have an accurate set without the 14 day offsets.
Just noticed they do not state where people vaccinated with a booster dose, catch COVID within 14 days of receiving it.
Most of these metrics, especially those used in Canada, had the sole purpose of vilifying the unvaccinated. Great article.
Most of these metrics, especially those used in Canada, had the sole purpose of vilifying the unvaccinated. Great article.
There are a lot of elderly in nursing homes that are simply too sick and frail to be vaccinated even if they wanted it. If they get Covid they will quite likely die and will count as an unvaccinated death. Given that the average age of those dying from Covid is over 80 it strikes me that a lot of the unvaccinated death count could be from this cohort. How on earth we’d find out if this was true I don’t know. Statistics regarding cases and deaths have almost become meaningless
Makes sense to me! Thank you, Jestre😊
Lovely picture, is it chinese propaganda that was shown at the start of this operation?
🤯 And it gets worse: "Scientists are currently attempting to develop "contagious vaccines" that would spread from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated, according to a new report." That's one way to ensure 100% vaccination...
https://www.theblaze.com/news/scientists-developing-contagious-vaccines?
A contagion which spreads from one person to the next on its own, and immunises them after a period of illness is called a what?
"I'll take 'virus' for $20, Alex"
I suspect the "spike protein shedding" was an attempt at this. Too much money floating around too many evil hands. Terrifying.