One of my questions with no real accurate numbers is how many people in Canada with the exception of 5 to 11 year olds are actually vaccinated. How do we know if the numbers being reported are actually accurate. I would guess from a marketing point of view you would inflate the numbers to increase your sales, in this case the so called vaccine and to achieve a higher compliance rate. It seems from the current data available that I represent a very small minority in my age group as an unvaccinated individual. I am nearly 72.
I tend to take the vaccination numbers at face value. I think there was instances in the US/UK where they admitted they were overreported and in a lot of countries like Ukraine people can buy vaccine passports really easily so those are probably too high. But the Canadian numbers align with my perceptions. Sadly we are fish in a fishbowl so it's hard to get an accurate reading. The unvaccinated numbers are what I take issue with.
I think judging by how many people turned out across Canada to join the freedom convoy and the loss of freedoms it's safe to say the number of unvaccinated in Canada may be dramatically underestimated.
I've always wondered whether any of the thawed unused vials, which had to be destroyed each day, were counted as administered jabs. I just don't think we unjabbed are as small of a minority as they are making us out to be.
The purpose is for the unjabbed to give up, by making them feel like total outliers, outcasts, the nut ones, out of step and in conflict with the rest of the society. As well, to skew the stats to paint significantly higher hospitalization/death rates than what the reality is. "1984" rules.
I totally agree, this psy-op has been so utterly ubiquitous, I've also referred to this as living in an Orwellian nightmare. It has also infected every formerly trusted (some more, some less) segment of society: family doctor, cpso, public health, media, and of course "grubberment" of all levels. They've mostly become filthy liars and any credibility they had has been destroyed forever.
Thanks for the great links! The conformity video was really interesting and made me think of the famous Milgram Experiment and how easily people can dispose of their ethics and instincts when told to do so.
I wonder what happens - if anyhing does or even can happen - regarding blood from (un)vaccinated donors and (un)vaccinated recipients respectively.
Would the spikes show up in an unvaccinated receiver from a vaccinated donor?
Not having any medical education beyond very basic CPR (the stuff you do once a year at work) I haven't the foggiest. Not that I think any ill effect would show up - normal vaccines doesn't seem to act like that, but this mRNA stuff is new and far from normal.
A good question. I would also want to know if the mRNA can be transferred in the blood from vaccinated to unvaccinated. Your body can detox the spike protein on its own but the mRNA is another matter altogether.
I have also wondered this. The deception and lies being perpetrated throughout this insane time make me feel great terror at even the idea of being hospitalized. I have totally lost trust in the medical profession generally, which perhaps is not fair.
Thank you for this. My first substack read today, and now I might be able to sleep better 🤓. Clearly it is easy for these governments to hoodwink the average citizen who doesn't have the advanced knowledge to tease the numbers apart. Thanks for shining a light on their "sleight of hand."
Nice write up. Vaccines are still said to help with hospitalization, but that neglects the placebo effect. Perhaps that's also worth discussing.
There is a big psychological component to seeking medical care for a respiratory virus. With so much COVID panic, it's unsurprising that vaccinated people are more likely to tough it out at home (you are protected!). The constantly-hectored unvaccinated (you are going to die!) feel more vulnerable if they get sick, so disproportionately they go to the hospital.
There's so many factors between that, edge cases, etc. Funny enough, vaccinated also die disproportionately to how often they end up in the ICU (perverse incentives in treatment could play a role). If you go into death rates in Ontario... Keeping in mind the numbers I used here show about 3.5x more unvaccinated than the numbers they are using (these numbers are actually conservative believe it or not) then it's easy to adjust the unvaccinated case rates down. I bet by their metrics the vaccine has little effect on deaths (I haven't checked just a hunch)
I have been following the Ontario hospitalization and ICU rates for some time. In those numbers, they also pull a fast one or two. Firstly, they only just started reporting the percentage in hospital "with" C19 vs "from" C19 (they had to admit they were putting these groups together, up until a few months ago). It is about 50% for each of "for" and "with" on average. Next they tell you the number of patients from each category (e.g., UV, FV, PV) but they don't tell you which of those is in the "from" or "with" group. So conceivably, the vaccinated could be disproportionately in the "from" category and we'd never know.
Secondly, they report on their pie charts raw numbers for hospitalizations and the ICU. These are what most people look at. But what they don't include on their pie charts, is the number in hospital/ICU with "unknown" status, which according to their own definition is primarily "vaccinated" but it is not in the system (link below). For example, if a person was vaccinated in the US, they would have to go through a process upon their return to have this entered into the system.
So yesterday, March 30th, the pie charts show UV: 25, PV: 3 and FV: 60. But when you look elsewhere (and how many people actually do this) for the total number in ICU with/from, it is 165. So 77 with unknown vaxx status (and how probable is this?)!
On first glance, while it appears the UV are disproportionately represented, in fact they are 15% of the ICU beds, which is inline with the alleged population rate for unvaccinated or thereabouts. As stated by Astrid Stuckleberger, the stats around Covid have been murky at best.
Yes, exactly, the with/ of, the Unknown status, and another one too: Th fact that "unvaxxed" definition included people who have had one shot for up to 13 days. Somebody analysed AB data (it could have been this blog even) and found many deaths and hospitalizations were attributed to "unvaxxed" but they were with shot - where in the first 13 days, there is a negative efficacy. I have a friend, who's husband got sick with within the 13 days. He now has "long covid" or pretty much AIDS, is on disability and can only work a few days a week. He worked in a non medical role on a covid ward. I know several people who got sick this way after receiving their first shot, but they made assumption that they got sick because they were not fully vaccinated. What have we done to allow this kind of brainwashing!
Right? Similar to my former sis-in-laws husband. He had chest pains 3-4 days post his first jab, and then a massive heart attack on day 8. He ended up in heart surgery and in ICU - he'd have been counted as an unvaccinated C19 case if he tested positive (I am not sure he did or not, I didn't ask, as she was distraught over deciding she'd get the shots as her kids did, and he followed suit). Now she can't get any Toronto doc with her husband's team to acknowledge it was potentially jab related and file an AE report, let alone sign off on an exemption for him. It is criminal and evil.
And you are right, they believe correlation equals causation when it is convenient, and discount it when it is not.
Wow great analysis! I have been trying to figure out for months how they were cooking the books for vaccination rates but couldn't work out how they were doing it. As you noted, it's not possible to get 100% of a population vaccinated there will always be those who either can't be vaccinated or choose not to be. You figured it out, thank you!
One of my questions with no real accurate numbers is how many people in Canada with the exception of 5 to 11 year olds are actually vaccinated. How do we know if the numbers being reported are actually accurate. I would guess from a marketing point of view you would inflate the numbers to increase your sales, in this case the so called vaccine and to achieve a higher compliance rate. It seems from the current data available that I represent a very small minority in my age group as an unvaccinated individual. I am nearly 72.
I tend to take the vaccination numbers at face value. I think there was instances in the US/UK where they admitted they were overreported and in a lot of countries like Ukraine people can buy vaccine passports really easily so those are probably too high. But the Canadian numbers align with my perceptions. Sadly we are fish in a fishbowl so it's hard to get an accurate reading. The unvaccinated numbers are what I take issue with.
I think judging by how many people turned out across Canada to join the freedom convoy and the loss of freedoms it's safe to say the number of unvaccinated in Canada may be dramatically underestimated.
Maybe, according to this, you might have more company than you are aware of!
I've always wondered whether any of the thawed unused vials, which had to be destroyed each day, were counted as administered jabs. I just don't think we unjabbed are as small of a minority as they are making us out to be.
Very good point, they never reveal how the data is collected. I think the devil is always in the details.
Bingo
The purpose is for the unjabbed to give up, by making them feel like total outliers, outcasts, the nut ones, out of step and in conflict with the rest of the society. As well, to skew the stats to paint significantly higher hospitalization/death rates than what the reality is. "1984" rules.
https://youtu.be/0s4SUh6wrCM - forcing conformity. Even if it does not work on us, it does work, on the whole, a scientifically proven fact. The society at large is being worked on in efficient proven ways. This is called psyops, or psychological warfare. The UK scientists openly admitted to waging a psychological warfare on their citizens (https://www.jpost.com/health-science/scientists-join-the-fight-against-vaccine-misinformation-release-guide-654708, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10454515/Psychologists-slam-Governments-nudge-unit-use-grossly-unethical-scare-tactics-Covid.html). So did Canada's military (https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/psychological-warfare-influence-campaign-canadian-armed-forces-1.6079084).
I totally agree, this psy-op has been so utterly ubiquitous, I've also referred to this as living in an Orwellian nightmare. It has also infected every formerly trusted (some more, some less) segment of society: family doctor, cpso, public health, media, and of course "grubberment" of all levels. They've mostly become filthy liars and any credibility they had has been destroyed forever.
Thanks for the great links! The conformity video was really interesting and made me think of the famous Milgram Experiment and how easily people can dispose of their ethics and instincts when told to do so.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9DxSKTSoA_E
I wonder what happens - if anyhing does or even can happen - regarding blood from (un)vaccinated donors and (un)vaccinated recipients respectively.
Would the spikes show up in an unvaccinated receiver from a vaccinated donor?
Not having any medical education beyond very basic CPR (the stuff you do once a year at work) I haven't the foggiest. Not that I think any ill effect would show up - normal vaccines doesn't seem to act like that, but this mRNA stuff is new and far from normal.
Just throwing more fule on the fire perhaps.
A good question. I would also want to know if the mRNA can be transferred in the blood from vaccinated to unvaccinated. Your body can detox the spike protein on its own but the mRNA is another matter altogether.
I have also wondered this. The deception and lies being perpetrated throughout this insane time make me feel great terror at even the idea of being hospitalized. I have totally lost trust in the medical profession generally, which perhaps is not fair.
That's a very relevant question that has bothered me as well.
Data Science + Political Science = logical fallacy madness when operated in a corrupt system.
Thank you for this. My first substack read today, and now I might be able to sleep better 🤓. Clearly it is easy for these governments to hoodwink the average citizen who doesn't have the advanced knowledge to tease the numbers apart. Thanks for shining a light on their "sleight of hand."
Wow, great work! I never trusted these statistics. This explains how they have been manipulated!
Nice write up. Vaccines are still said to help with hospitalization, but that neglects the placebo effect. Perhaps that's also worth discussing.
There is a big psychological component to seeking medical care for a respiratory virus. With so much COVID panic, it's unsurprising that vaccinated people are more likely to tough it out at home (you are protected!). The constantly-hectored unvaccinated (you are going to die!) feel more vulnerable if they get sick, so disproportionately they go to the hospital.
There's so many factors between that, edge cases, etc. Funny enough, vaccinated also die disproportionately to how often they end up in the ICU (perverse incentives in treatment could play a role). If you go into death rates in Ontario... Keeping in mind the numbers I used here show about 3.5x more unvaccinated than the numbers they are using (these numbers are actually conservative believe it or not) then it's easy to adjust the unvaccinated case rates down. I bet by their metrics the vaccine has little effect on deaths (I haven't checked just a hunch)
I have been following the Ontario hospitalization and ICU rates for some time. In those numbers, they also pull a fast one or two. Firstly, they only just started reporting the percentage in hospital "with" C19 vs "from" C19 (they had to admit they were putting these groups together, up until a few months ago). It is about 50% for each of "for" and "with" on average. Next they tell you the number of patients from each category (e.g., UV, FV, PV) but they don't tell you which of those is in the "from" or "with" group. So conceivably, the vaccinated could be disproportionately in the "from" category and we'd never know.
Secondly, they report on their pie charts raw numbers for hospitalizations and the ICU. These are what most people look at. But what they don't include on their pie charts, is the number in hospital/ICU with "unknown" status, which according to their own definition is primarily "vaccinated" but it is not in the system (link below). For example, if a person was vaccinated in the US, they would have to go through a process upon their return to have this entered into the system.
So yesterday, March 30th, the pie charts show UV: 25, PV: 3 and FV: 60. But when you look elsewhere (and how many people actually do this) for the total number in ICU with/from, it is 165. So 77 with unknown vaxx status (and how probable is this?)!
On first glance, while it appears the UV are disproportionately represented, in fact they are 15% of the ICU beds, which is inline with the alleged population rate for unvaccinated or thereabouts. As stated by Astrid Stuckleberger, the stats around Covid have been murky at best.
See: https://covid-19.ontario.ca/data/hospitalizations - note the eye goes to the pretty pie charts, and not to the table at the top with the total numbers.
Link to Ontario definitions for "unknown" status: https://health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/publichealth/coronavirus/docs/vaccine/COVID-19_guidance_for_individuals_vaccinated_outside_of_ontario.pdf
Yes, exactly, the with/ of, the Unknown status, and another one too: Th fact that "unvaxxed" definition included people who have had one shot for up to 13 days. Somebody analysed AB data (it could have been this blog even) and found many deaths and hospitalizations were attributed to "unvaxxed" but they were with shot - where in the first 13 days, there is a negative efficacy. I have a friend, who's husband got sick with within the 13 days. He now has "long covid" or pretty much AIDS, is on disability and can only work a few days a week. He worked in a non medical role on a covid ward. I know several people who got sick this way after receiving their first shot, but they made assumption that they got sick because they were not fully vaccinated. What have we done to allow this kind of brainwashing!
Right? Similar to my former sis-in-laws husband. He had chest pains 3-4 days post his first jab, and then a massive heart attack on day 8. He ended up in heart surgery and in ICU - he'd have been counted as an unvaccinated C19 case if he tested positive (I am not sure he did or not, I didn't ask, as she was distraught over deciding she'd get the shots as her kids did, and he followed suit). Now she can't get any Toronto doc with her husband's team to acknowledge it was potentially jab related and file an AE report, let alone sign off on an exemption for him. It is criminal and evil.
And you are right, they believe correlation equals causation when it is convenient, and discount it when it is not.
Wow great analysis! I have been trying to figure out for months how they were cooking the books for vaccination rates but couldn't work out how they were doing it. As you noted, it's not possible to get 100% of a population vaccinated there will always be those who either can't be vaccinated or choose not to be. You figured it out, thank you!