I remember a time when I was hopeful at least one data set would be posted on one of the internal university libraries I have access to or Harvard dataverse type sites.... Nope. I have become more jaded since then...
Want some laughs? Look at the data posted by California Dept of Public "Health", showing that the unvaxxed are almost 5 times more likely to test positive with covid than those who are boosted.
Oof. Someone should tell Pfizer. Pretty sure they'd love a success story right about now considering basically everywhere in the world has contradictory data and even the studies trying to make the vaccines look better aren't finding those kind of results.
Put simply, the data, upon close inspection, invariably reconciles to the epidemiological data, which shows one thing unambiguously: the inoculations simply do not work.
We must not lose sight of the fact that the goal of the inoculations was to stop the disease dead in its tracks. The inoculations do not do this now, and have never done this. In fact, Bayesian analysis of the per-country epidemiological data indicates the inoculations have led to an INCREASED incidence of disease.
And how about the immunity of those of us who, by now, have had multiple exposures to multiple variants-- which is, I think, the real hybrid immunity? We're the small segment of people who represent what population-level immunity would look like if we had never vaccinated anyone, and I'm not expecting to be recruited for a study anytime soon.
Full data? Like showing your work? Nah, that ends after 7th grade math. After that, charlatans just make stuff up.
I remember a time when I was hopeful at least one data set would be posted on one of the internal university libraries I have access to or Harvard dataverse type sites.... Nope. I have become more jaded since then...
Want some laughs? Look at the data posted by California Dept of Public "Health", showing that the unvaxxed are almost 5 times more likely to test positive with covid than those who are boosted.
https://covid19.ca.gov/state-dashboard/#postvax-status
I'm sure there is no data cooking, no difference in PCR settings, nothing. Apparently, negative efficacy doesn't exist on the West coast.
Oof. Someone should tell Pfizer. Pretty sure they'd love a success story right about now considering basically everywhere in the world has contradictory data and even the studies trying to make the vaccines look better aren't finding those kind of results.
Put simply, the data, upon close inspection, invariably reconciles to the epidemiological data, which shows one thing unambiguously: the inoculations simply do not work.
We must not lose sight of the fact that the goal of the inoculations was to stop the disease dead in its tracks. The inoculations do not do this now, and have never done this. In fact, Bayesian analysis of the per-country epidemiological data indicates the inoculations have led to an INCREASED incidence of disease.
https://allfactsmatter.substack.com/p/how-many-red-flags-are-enough
And how about the immunity of those of us who, by now, have had multiple exposures to multiple variants-- which is, I think, the real hybrid immunity? We're the small segment of people who represent what population-level immunity would look like if we had never vaccinated anyone, and I'm not expecting to be recruited for a study anytime soon.
Technically speaking, what you're describing is known as cross-immunity, a known phenomenon.