I am short on time this morning but wanted to respond to this moronic article by CNBC. I encourage people to read the article and the “study” for themselves, but suffice it to say, the entire premise is based on a lie. The article in question is about children 5-11, a cohort completely absent from the paper. If the findings of the study were true, it would still be a lie to extrapolate (one does not simply assume efficacy for a population not studied) the results down to that age group based on those findings.
Yes, this one is perhaps the most laughable of a deluge of laughable science-government-pharma-media scams to date. Pay no attention to the multiple Israeli studies behind the curtain that point 180-degrees opposite regarding "nattymunes."
Yes, this one is perhaps the most laughable of a deluge of laughable science-government-pharma-media scams to date. Pay no attention to the multiple Israeli studies behind the curtain that point 180-degrees opposite regarding "nattymunes."