Hmmm, my guess would be experimental, insufficiently tested gene therapy shots that have now been proven to not only be ineffective, but dangerous. Everyone I know knows at least a few people who have been harmed by the shots.
If you don't know that the vaccines caused the above-normal number of deaths, why would you ever mention that it can't be the vaccines, unless you suspect it's the vaccines?
"Who took the goodies that were for after supper?"
"I didn't! Wasn't me what took the chocolate-chip cookies with honey glaze!"
That seems to be the level of intelligence, competence and honesty among canadian civil servants?
Iatrogenic harm, ie medical errors. I think the medical system has always been a balance of harm versus healing. When covid started they panicked and made a bunch of changes that shifted the balance the wrong way.
Very good; more in depth than my quote. Interesting that Shakespeare had a number of examples of betrayal in his writing. Thanks for stimulating the little gray cells
"But is this happening elsewhere with the same age ranges?"
That's the question of the hour. If it isn't happening elsewhere, it's difficult to say what changed in Alberta otherwise. Unless there is a serious accounting error in Alberta's data collection. My first reaction would be to ask what they are double counting and where?
"There is nothing even SURPRISING about a medical treatment having a serious "stochastic" harm and yet people act like you're a fucking nutjob"
Behold, the fruit borne by decades of societal indolence. It's easy to assume that the regulatory system is working just as we think it's meant to. And it might be that it is working as it's meant to! But our perceptions of how it should work are based on the assumption that the system is supposed to protect people's health, rather than enrich the participants. An assumption that may be wrong.
Hmmm, my guess would be experimental, insufficiently tested gene therapy shots that have now been proven to not only be ineffective, but dangerous. Everyone I know knows at least a few people who have been harmed by the shots.
If you don't know that the vaccines caused the above-normal number of deaths, why would you ever mention that it can't be the vaccines, unless you suspect it's the vaccines?
"Who took the goodies that were for after supper?"
"I didn't! Wasn't me what took the chocolate-chip cookies with honey glaze!"
That seems to be the level of intelligence, competence and honesty among canadian civil servants?
Yep. The complete lack of skepticism from them and the media is disconcerting.
I believe a parody from Shakespeare is appropriate at this point; substitute government for lady. We probably have the answer as stated by Rikard.
"The lady doth protest too much, methinks"
"Here, under leave of Brutus and the rest,
(For Brutus is an honourable man;
So are they all; all honourable men)
Come I to speak in Caesar's funeral ...
He was my friend, faithful and just to me:
But Brutus says he was ambitious;
And Brutus is an honourable man…."
And the audience thinks: "If he's such an honourabe man, why the need to harp on and on and on about it?"...
Iatrogenic harm, ie medical errors. I think the medical system has always been a balance of harm versus healing. When covid started they panicked and made a bunch of changes that shifted the balance the wrong way.
https://norstadt.substack.com/p/excess-us-deaths-for-25-to-44-year
Great article. Thx
Very good; more in depth than my quote. Interesting that Shakespeare had a number of examples of betrayal in his writing. Thanks for stimulating the little gray cells
"But is this happening elsewhere with the same age ranges?"
That's the question of the hour. If it isn't happening elsewhere, it's difficult to say what changed in Alberta otherwise. Unless there is a serious accounting error in Alberta's data collection. My first reaction would be to ask what they are double counting and where?
"There is nothing even SURPRISING about a medical treatment having a serious "stochastic" harm and yet people act like you're a fucking nutjob"
Behold, the fruit borne by decades of societal indolence. It's easy to assume that the regulatory system is working just as we think it's meant to. And it might be that it is working as it's meant to! But our perceptions of how it should work are based on the assumption that the system is supposed to protect people's health, rather than enrich the participants. An assumption that may be wrong.