Great alternative way to look at the data - and damning for vaccine mandates/passports. If cases were properly counted from date of injection it would be even worse. Oh the books that will be written about this worldwide … psychosis? Fraud? Power grab?
Ever since they altered the testing policy at the start of January, they’ve been putting their thumb on the scale to try and hide the complete collapse of their entire public health policy. Even with “unknown vaccination status”, halting the testing/counting non severe cases, breaking out stats between people hospitalized with/because of COVID, and another lockdown their failure is still readily apparent.
It’s the equivalent of a child repeatedly making up the rules to a game, then changing them as soon as they’re losing.
Vaccine passports NEVER make sense whether the "vaccine" works or not. NEVER. If the vax works, no need to segregate the "protected" from the dirty and diseased. If they DO NOT work, then everyone is dirty and diseased and therefore no need for segregation. Vax passes are 1) hate crimes 2) a coercion tool 3) a gateway to Digital ID's, the REAL goal of all this
I have a question about this strange definitional technicality you mentioned regarding the "unknown". Could you explain in more detail exactly what that is? I am interested since these unknown cases seem to pop up everywhere in the world at different times and I'm trying to figure out if there are some common causes for it.
"Vaccine unknown: Includes people vaccinated with an unspecified vaccine product. This can occur when the name of the vaccine received is missing in the provincial or territorial vaccine registry."
Taken alone, it actually suggests all cases unknown are vaccinated. But I am not sure if they removed this definition from their site or not as I can't seem to find a link to verify whether that is the current definition or not (it's possible either my research skills are waning or they have removed it from the definitions list).
I will continue to look in order to give you a firm answer. Part of the reason I did not push the issue too hard in this article was because I failed to find more information.
I do think it’s quite possible that many of the unvaccinated have had Covid and therefore “actual” immunity. In the next wave you’ll see vaccines appearing more effective because all of them are getting omicron and therefore natural immunity. We are at or near a point where a vaccinated vs unvaccinated comparison is pure fiction.
The branch covidians always seem to forget that for something like 85% of the population before the "vaccine" ever came out, covid was anywhere from no symptoms to mild or moderate flu level symptoms.
So we were always really just dealing with 15% of the adult population who might benefit from taking a couple experimental mRNA injections.
And then when they get sick but don't die, they act like the vaccines were their savior. I mean, maybe the mRNA injections helped, but more likely they were never going to get very sick anyway
If anyone can link to Jestre's earlier articles that expand on the statement "even using the crooked definitions of the public health officials", please reply. People have been saying that Ontario proves that Covid policy is working, and I would like to be able to refute them.
What I can't understand is how come partially jabbed had the least rate of infection for a month now. This makes the whole data reporting from Ontario highly suspect. It's not worth the ink used to print it, let alone the paper it gets printed on.
Two factors likely contributing here, many of the cases are falling into the unvaccinated category and they have a sufficiently high level of natural immunity. Not ruling out the data being manipulated in some other way of course nor am I saying that would account for the entire difference
Most of the 1st shots are going to 5-11 year olds right now. With the change in case counts (for non severe cases) it greatly favours children (vaccinated or not).
Great alternative way to look at the data - and damning for vaccine mandates/passports. If cases were properly counted from date of injection it would be even worse. Oh the books that will be written about this worldwide … psychosis? Fraud? Power grab?
Ever since they altered the testing policy at the start of January, they’ve been putting their thumb on the scale to try and hide the complete collapse of their entire public health policy. Even with “unknown vaccination status”, halting the testing/counting non severe cases, breaking out stats between people hospitalized with/because of COVID, and another lockdown their failure is still readily apparent.
It’s the equivalent of a child repeatedly making up the rules to a game, then changing them as soon as they’re losing.
Vaccine passports NEVER make sense whether the "vaccine" works or not. NEVER. If the vax works, no need to segregate the "protected" from the dirty and diseased. If they DO NOT work, then everyone is dirty and diseased and therefore no need for segregation. Vax passes are 1) hate crimes 2) a coercion tool 3) a gateway to Digital ID's, the REAL goal of all this
Interesting way of visualising this.
I have a question about this strange definitional technicality you mentioned regarding the "unknown". Could you explain in more detail exactly what that is? I am interested since these unknown cases seem to pop up everywhere in the world at different times and I'm trying to figure out if there are some common causes for it.
A reader (WG) gave me this definition:
"Vaccine unknown: Includes people vaccinated with an unspecified vaccine product. This can occur when the name of the vaccine received is missing in the provincial or territorial vaccine registry."
Taken alone, it actually suggests all cases unknown are vaccinated. But I am not sure if they removed this definition from their site or not as I can't seem to find a link to verify whether that is the current definition or not (it's possible either my research skills are waning or they have removed it from the definitions list).
I will continue to look in order to give you a firm answer. Part of the reason I did not push the issue too hard in this article was because I failed to find more information.
Happening everywhere. Clearly the positive antibodies are decaying at a faster rate than the negative.
https://nakedemperor.substack.com/
I do think it’s quite possible that many of the unvaccinated have had Covid and therefore “actual” immunity. In the next wave you’ll see vaccines appearing more effective because all of them are getting omicron and therefore natural immunity. We are at or near a point where a vaccinated vs unvaccinated comparison is pure fiction.
We started at that point imo.
The branch covidians always seem to forget that for something like 85% of the population before the "vaccine" ever came out, covid was anywhere from no symptoms to mild or moderate flu level symptoms.
So we were always really just dealing with 15% of the adult population who might benefit from taking a couple experimental mRNA injections.
And then when they get sick but don't die, they act like the vaccines were their savior. I mean, maybe the mRNA injections helped, but more likely they were never going to get very sick anyway
If anyone can link to Jestre's earlier articles that expand on the statement "even using the crooked definitions of the public health officials", please reply. People have been saying that Ontario proves that Covid policy is working, and I would like to be able to refute them.
What I can't understand is how come partially jabbed had the least rate of infection for a month now. This makes the whole data reporting from Ontario highly suspect. It's not worth the ink used to print it, let alone the paper it gets printed on.
Two factors likely contributing here, many of the cases are falling into the unvaccinated category and they have a sufficiently high level of natural immunity. Not ruling out the data being manipulated in some other way of course nor am I saying that would account for the entire difference
Look at https://covid-19.ontario.ca/data/case-numbers-and-spread
I have been stumped ever since the partially jabbed fell to the lowest level after Jan. 4. 2022. As this is impossible, the whole reporting is trash.
Most of the 1st shots are going to 5-11 year olds right now. With the change in case counts (for non severe cases) it greatly favours children (vaccinated or not).
Thanks, that explains it - different cohorts! Poor kids though, even if at this rate.