I personally think that data needs to be collected and interpreted by an organization that has no conflicts of interest. It has been shown multiple times that the CDC, FDA , Pfizer and Moderna are incapable of collecting unbiased objective data and relaying it in a transparent manner.
I understand trying to disprove their claims using their own data as a clear, elegant, logical counter argument. This action inadvertently acknowledges their data and gives it validity.
In regards to your article, I would take it a step further. If a government is unable to keep track of population information through birth/death certificates, all information and statistics involving population data becomes worthless. As you have stated, slight adjustments to the denominator can lead to false conclusions and catastrophic decision making. Its better to have no data than polluted data.
Truly, how do we believe anything anymore that is published by the government and media. Observational data that we ourselves see and experience is becoming more and more important.
Thanks for going into the details.
They really are pulling all the stops to protect these crappy products. Good Lord, the desperation is leaving no stone unturned in their scam.
I personally think that data needs to be collected and interpreted by an organization that has no conflicts of interest. It has been shown multiple times that the CDC, FDA , Pfizer and Moderna are incapable of collecting unbiased objective data and relaying it in a transparent manner.
I understand trying to disprove their claims using their own data as a clear, elegant, logical counter argument. This action inadvertently acknowledges their data and gives it validity.
In regards to your article, I would take it a step further. If a government is unable to keep track of population information through birth/death certificates, all information and statistics involving population data becomes worthless. As you have stated, slight adjustments to the denominator can lead to false conclusions and catastrophic decision making. Its better to have no data than polluted data.
Truly, how do we believe anything anymore that is published by the government and media. Observational data that we ourselves see and experience is becoming more and more important.