On the final day before the holidays, I noted that Quebec claimed 55% of cases were in the unvaccinated, a sharp divergence from their daily trends. I suspected they would issue a correction to their data… well, they did not, but I will assume that the data has been corrected. Otherwise, yikes!
I was shocked to read that about 2/3 of cases were in the Unvaccinated! I pulled up the chart you show above, but for Tuesday, and it did show 12,833 cases, about 8,000 of which were in the Unvaccinated. And it showed the definition of Unvaccinated as including those who have taken their first vaccination in the last 14 days (as you point out in your helpful daily reports). So I wondered if most or all of the "Unvaccinated" cases were really just "breakthrough" infections after the first injections.
Good to see your analysis today, and good to see today's "Unvaccinated" case count is much lower. This seems much more believable than yesterdays figures and the statement of the Health Minister.
Wild. I didn't see that. That is almost FOIA request worthy as a lie that big twice in a week implies some nefarious activities. Would love to see the briefing material prepared for the minister.
Brilliant Thank you. Another one bookmarked for the future publication of the encyclopedia of public deception practiced without any hesitation or explanation by authorities all over the world.
Its possible it was just a statistical blip driven by the newly vaccinated 5-11 y/o cohort. But Ontario, whose rates in the vaccinated are now well above those in the unvaccinated, only had 84.8% (probably +1-3% from newly vaccinated individuals) of their new cases coming from the vaccinated cohort in the same time period. 93% seems to be pushing things especially considering there are definitely more vaccinated cases being counted as unvaccinated in the first 14 days.
It's totally possible but it's just another category of "adjustments" that are timed to perfection by health authorities all around the world. I say this because if you remember, Denmark was publishing Omicron vs Non-Omicron cases on a daily basis, then they started censoring the 5-11 cases which was a huge number! and finally stopped publishing the numbers by vaccination altogether.
The particular case might end up not being one of the perfect examples, but it sure is a candidate.
Yeah. The suppression for anything off narrative is real. I think the UK is the only place that has published data that looks terrible for the vaccinated for an extended period of time (but convienently, the "warnings" for why you cant use case rates to calculate VE only came after the vaccination began to look terrible). Literally from Big Pharmas playbook and convienently their lobbyists are regularly meeting with most state and federal governments.
Interesting!
Yesterday I was reading on Canada's Propaganda Service about Quebec's covid situation ( https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/quebec-health-workers-job-covid-1.6299204 ), and the Quebec Health Minister was quoted as saying that of 12,833 cases on Tuesday, about 8,000 were in the Unvaccinated.
I was shocked to read that about 2/3 of cases were in the Unvaccinated! I pulled up the chart you show above, but for Tuesday, and it did show 12,833 cases, about 8,000 of which were in the Unvaccinated. And it showed the definition of Unvaccinated as including those who have taken their first vaccination in the last 14 days (as you point out in your helpful daily reports). So I wondered if most or all of the "Unvaccinated" cases were really just "breakthrough" infections after the first injections.
Good to see your analysis today, and good to see today's "Unvaccinated" case count is much lower. This seems much more believable than yesterdays figures and the statement of the Health Minister.
Wild. I didn't see that. That is almost FOIA request worthy as a lie that big twice in a week implies some nefarious activities. Would love to see the briefing material prepared for the minister.
Brilliant Thank you. Another one bookmarked for the future publication of the encyclopedia of public deception practiced without any hesitation or explanation by authorities all over the world.
Its possible it was just a statistical blip driven by the newly vaccinated 5-11 y/o cohort. But Ontario, whose rates in the vaccinated are now well above those in the unvaccinated, only had 84.8% (probably +1-3% from newly vaccinated individuals) of their new cases coming from the vaccinated cohort in the same time period. 93% seems to be pushing things especially considering there are definitely more vaccinated cases being counted as unvaccinated in the first 14 days.
It's totally possible but it's just another category of "adjustments" that are timed to perfection by health authorities all around the world. I say this because if you remember, Denmark was publishing Omicron vs Non-Omicron cases on a daily basis, then they started censoring the 5-11 cases which was a huge number! and finally stopped publishing the numbers by vaccination altogether.
The particular case might end up not being one of the perfect examples, but it sure is a candidate.
Yeah. The suppression for anything off narrative is real. I think the UK is the only place that has published data that looks terrible for the vaccinated for an extended period of time (but convienently, the "warnings" for why you cant use case rates to calculate VE only came after the vaccination began to look terrible). Literally from Big Pharmas playbook and convienently their lobbyists are regularly meeting with most state and federal governments.