Alex Berenson had an interesting post on how they use (or don't) medical billing codes to obscure the cause of death, as there is no code for "vaccine" being the "cause" of death. I can recall reading a number of obituaries over the past year of people that died "after a short illness", which, in the cases I'm familiar with, seems to be a euphemism for "shortly after getting vaccinated". Most of these people were pretty old. Which begs the question: how can they keep saying that vaccines are "effective" for the "most vulnerable" (i.e. the sick and elderly)? That age cohort seems to me to be dying in droves from both COVID and/or the vaccines. But its all obscured because "old people die all the time". But that doesn't explain the skyrocketing life insurance claims paid for 25-65 yo that are demonstrably NOT from COVID... All part of the Plandemic, I guess...
Yes, that's why I found the younger age of death in the supplementary for myocarditis interesting and also why I want to see the omitted deaths. They may very well be much younger, which is a clear signal that the vaccine is at fault.
One of the other limitations of this study was they assume that vaccine adverse events can only occur in the first 28 days. There is no reason for that to be true. Graphic example: there is a case of a woman that has had vaginal bleeding for 94 days straight after the Moderna vaccine. How does 28 days catch that and how can severity be accurately measured? I think there was a study that said women will have a slightly longer period on average after the shots... Sorry but, on average? There's actually a chapter on averages in How to lie with statistics. What do they mean pn average? Do they mean 1 in 100 will have a 3 month long period but the other 99 will have no changes?
My wife's friend's father is around 65. He was very fit and ran 3-6 miles/week. His wife is an executive at a small pharma company in suburban Chicago. Last summer he got the 2 Pfizer shots and 2 weeks later became extremely ill with pericarditis, which had him in a coma for a while, and has had to have 24 hour home care for several months now. His wife absolutely refused to believe it could have been caused by the vaccine as every doctor they saw said it could only be a coincidence. Very intelligent woman. She kept telling her daughter that "the FDA would never approve a dangerous vaccine". Just recently she had to take him to the emergency room and the ER doc told her he thought it was likely that it was due to the vaccine; the first doc to say so among probably a dozen that they've seen. So in the context of this report, if he dies from a heart condition several months after he gets the vaccine, there is NO WAY they would ever attribute it to the vaccine (and I'm sure the reaction was NOT entered into VAERS). Even though the vaccine is the ONLY reason he has the condition. And even though he was extremely fit, he is old enough (like Bob Saget) that they would use that as another excuse not to connect the dots. This is how Eugenicists will get away with genocide and will not be held accountable...in fact, they might even get awards for their business acumen (Borla) and "humanitarian" efforts.
Interestingly, I recall a rather mainstream doctor in Canada mention that he thought the blood clot risks were much higher than the reported 1 in 100k (or whatever it was at the time) and likely closer to 1 in 10k, but they were being hidden because Canada chose to vaccinate the eldest population first. First and last time he said that then that narrative disappeared into the fog after AZ was basically barred from Canada despite lots of evidence showing Pfizer and Moderna also cause clotting.
Alex Berenson had an interesting post on how they use (or don't) medical billing codes to obscure the cause of death, as there is no code for "vaccine" being the "cause" of death. I can recall reading a number of obituaries over the past year of people that died "after a short illness", which, in the cases I'm familiar with, seems to be a euphemism for "shortly after getting vaccinated". Most of these people were pretty old. Which begs the question: how can they keep saying that vaccines are "effective" for the "most vulnerable" (i.e. the sick and elderly)? That age cohort seems to me to be dying in droves from both COVID and/or the vaccines. But its all obscured because "old people die all the time". But that doesn't explain the skyrocketing life insurance claims paid for 25-65 yo that are demonstrably NOT from COVID... All part of the Plandemic, I guess...
Yes, that's why I found the younger age of death in the supplementary for myocarditis interesting and also why I want to see the omitted deaths. They may very well be much younger, which is a clear signal that the vaccine is at fault.
One of the other limitations of this study was they assume that vaccine adverse events can only occur in the first 28 days. There is no reason for that to be true. Graphic example: there is a case of a woman that has had vaginal bleeding for 94 days straight after the Moderna vaccine. How does 28 days catch that and how can severity be accurately measured? I think there was a study that said women will have a slightly longer period on average after the shots... Sorry but, on average? There's actually a chapter on averages in How to lie with statistics. What do they mean pn average? Do they mean 1 in 100 will have a 3 month long period but the other 99 will have no changes?
Pandemic is right
My wife's friend's father is around 65. He was very fit and ran 3-6 miles/week. His wife is an executive at a small pharma company in suburban Chicago. Last summer he got the 2 Pfizer shots and 2 weeks later became extremely ill with pericarditis, which had him in a coma for a while, and has had to have 24 hour home care for several months now. His wife absolutely refused to believe it could have been caused by the vaccine as every doctor they saw said it could only be a coincidence. Very intelligent woman. She kept telling her daughter that "the FDA would never approve a dangerous vaccine". Just recently she had to take him to the emergency room and the ER doc told her he thought it was likely that it was due to the vaccine; the first doc to say so among probably a dozen that they've seen. So in the context of this report, if he dies from a heart condition several months after he gets the vaccine, there is NO WAY they would ever attribute it to the vaccine (and I'm sure the reaction was NOT entered into VAERS). Even though the vaccine is the ONLY reason he has the condition. And even though he was extremely fit, he is old enough (like Bob Saget) that they would use that as another excuse not to connect the dots. This is how Eugenicists will get away with genocide and will not be held accountable...in fact, they might even get awards for their business acumen (Borla) and "humanitarian" efforts.
Interestingly, I recall a rather mainstream doctor in Canada mention that he thought the blood clot risks were much higher than the reported 1 in 100k (or whatever it was at the time) and likely closer to 1 in 10k, but they were being hidden because Canada chose to vaccinate the eldest population first. First and last time he said that then that narrative disappeared into the fog after AZ was basically barred from Canada despite lots of evidence showing Pfizer and Moderna also cause clotting.